There is no denying the fact that the phenomenon of traditional person to person interaction has been changed due to technology being ubiquitous across the globe due to its paramount importance. One school of thought opine that it is worthless, however, others consider that a couple of problems also occur because of the same. Although this has a plethora of merits, numerous demerits are also there which will be elaborated in upcoming paragraphs.
Initiating with the best possible benefits, the most significant advantage is the advancement of technology made people contact from any part of the globe through video calls. Along with it, technology made possible the people relations stronger by partaking in wedding occasions and being involved in funeral services more than before even though, individuals cannot involve themselves. To cite an example, in the pandemic season, the technology proved and helped people in more ways online to some extent. As a result, if people could not see face to face, the innovation of smartphones and new technologies made people easier to contact as soon as possible at any time at their available fingertips valuable time with family and friends.
On the paradoxical side, there are many drawbacks as well. first and foremost, when people have these facilities masses cut down eye to eye interaction and satisfy themselves with video calls. For instance, in current edge, most people are addicted and engaged in their world chatting other individuals have lost heartfelt feelings due to that. secondly when comes to disadvantages, in family relations have been misled and leads to social problems because of this advancement. consequently, the social and family relations of a person are affected because of not having time together and social relations also distorted
To conclude, without any doubt, this is a mixed bag. If this topic has many positives, then the negative points of this notion may not be underestimated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...side, there are many drawbacks as well. first and foremost, when people have these fa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...ve lost heartfelt feelings due to that. secondly when comes to disadvantages, in family ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...l problems because of this advancement. consequently, the social and family relations of a p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 315.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82149543376 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580952380952 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.088108274 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.615384615 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290542624623 0.242375264174 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883281072316 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382400934846 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142340987178 0.151781067708 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0426102915266 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.