Governments and companies should work together to reverse environmental damage rather than individuals responsible for that, to what extent do you agree or disagree and relevant examples
Without any doubt, society is divided into two groups as per their distinct mindset of different people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue whether, environmental preservation is the only responsibility of authorities and big companies, not depends upon individuals. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions, but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favour. First of all, government can impose penalty on improper method of littering things on public places. And also, authorities has the power to solve environmental issues by enacting strict laws that prevent deforestation and illegal sand mining. The second point is, imposing taxes on industries for untreated method of discarding waste into rivers. Big companies can do research on it and enhance the use of renewable source of energy. To exemplify, private companies can give subsidies and encourage public to use solar panels at home and as well as in any sectors. As a consequence, government and companies can improve the quality of environment in a reversible way to a large extent.
Moving toward the second argument of this debate, the first point is that, every individuals has the responsible for keeping their environment immaccuable. People should combost the waste in proper place furthermore, should reduce the usage of plastic to eco-friendly materials such as jute bags. In addition, people should teach their children how to take care of environment hand down to generation. Apart from this people must stop for logging and poaching which are the main causes for environmental detrimental effect which can be beneficial way of preserving nature by themselves.
In conclusion, according to my perceptive, I concur that, although government and big companies has the greatest role in protecting the environment the role of individuals cannot be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | soji_kab@hotmail.com | 89 | view |
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach 78
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper based books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
- Some people spent most of their lives living close to where they were born What might be the reasons for this What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 78
- Having a salaried job is better than being self employed To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- Write about the following topic Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve the problem Give reasons for your answer and 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 734, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a reversible way" with adverb for "reversible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... can improve the quality of environment in a reversible way to a large extent. Moving toward the s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ent hand down to generation. Apart from this people must stop for logging and poachi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32038834951 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03389730199 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605177993528 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8281721832 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159458986204 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486520201277 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395038076959 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847297307407 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341357084297 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.