The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree?
Today, we facing major issue on unemployment, most of youngster moving toward other place for work. Although the government concern this problem to solve by developing the rural areas to urban areas. I don’t agree this idea it is only effective way to develop unemployment rate.
For example, the Nigeria government developed rapid urbanization to reduce unemployment but the reflection is negative because people adapted to modern technology and innovation, which make them to search only white-collar job. Furthermore, the traditional job from society got decreased such as agriculture, fishing, poultry farming etc.
The recent analyses said most of rural people engaging in to self-employment rather than urban people. So, urban people seeking job and moving place to place, it increase the work man supply and make demand for job, finally it peaking up to unemployment. In such case rural people creating a job to survey and reduce the unemployment rate. For instance, the article released in FROBES magazine highest amount of people outcome of urban area have fewer jobs than rural area.
In conclusion, the rapid development of urbanization is not an effective way by only way of standardizing the rural area it reduces unemployment, then after it can develop slowly in to urban.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-30 | venkatesh1018 | 84 | view |
- Nowadays people are increasingly dependent on their smart phones Is this positive trend What are advantages or disadvantages of this dependency Support your point of view with reason and examples from your own experience or observations 81
- Success in today’s society is measure in term of wealthy. To what extent do you agree with this definition of success should society take in to consideration? 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers should be paid according to how much their students learn. Give specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 61
- Polygamy has increased widely in recent years. What solutions can you bring forward to decrease this issue? 77
- As global trade increases between different countries, many daily necessities are produced in other countries. Such goods are usually transported a long distance. Do the benefits of this trend outweigh its drawbacks? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter moving toward other place for work. Although the government concern this problem to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aditional job from society got decreased such as agriculture, fishing, poultry fa...
^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...riculture, fishing, poultry farming etc. The recent analyses said most of rural p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...eking job and moving place to place, it increase the work man supply and make demand for...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'magazine the highest'.
Suggestion: magazine the highest
...nstance, the article released in FROBES magazine highest amount of people outcome of urban area ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, so, then, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.5418719212 28% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34634146341 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9828939232 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624390243902 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7515027076 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119366738096 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566303672428 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870008824129 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934950865418 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557180395687 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.