Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, the subject regarding whether parents are responsible for children’s acts and behavior has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that parent’s responsibility is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by noticeable numbers of individuals. I am inclined to believe that parents role in children’s action can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, children’s behavior can provide the society with some undeniable effects which are rooted in the fact that the family support, as well as troubled childhood, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered children imitate all their parent’s manner. Therefore, beneficial ramifications of both upbringing and teaching distinctly can be seen.
Within the realm of psychological science, poor schooling increases the consequences of crime in the society. Moreover, detrimental aspects of juvenile delinquency and violent behavior relate to this reality that the demerits of children pertain to their upbringing and lack of moral compass and character. As a tangible example, a scientific reason undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that teenagers’ behavior is correlated negatively with social training. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of direct upbringing.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the benefits of parents’ role far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does offspring’s behavior prove the significance of family in shaping child personality, but also pinpoints
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I firmly believe that the benefits of N far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only does N prove the significance of N, but also pinpoints social and personal implications.
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- Law change human behavior 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng child personality, but also pinpoints To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77181208054 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42837422565 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590604026846 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9587911362 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.307692308 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160359294277 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552164081117 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607175945012 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818756617842 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0656809570134 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.