Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?

Essay topics:

Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?

A childs action speaks of parents teachings. Some people think that parents should be held legally responsible for their childrens’ act, while others maintain the other way around. This essay will discuss that why parents should be held accountable for their children’s act.

Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of holding parents accountable for their childrens’ act. To begin with, parents are the best teachers and can preach best ethical values and inculcate good moral values in their children. Additionally, the proportion of attention given by parents is manifested through a childs good or bad actions and consequently depicts the level of involvment and fullfilment of responsibility by parents. Hence, owing to the primary role that parents have, they must be held responsible for their childrens’ act.

On the other hand, proponents of the view that parents should be held accountable for their children’s act support the proposition until the child is under 18 years of age. Therefore, by reaching the age limit of grown ups parents are no more required to be held responsible for their kids actions. As an example, law of California act 1990 clearly specifies parents to be accountable for their children's’ act aged under 18. As a matter of fact, parents are still required to be held accountable for their child's action and involvement in criminal activities in the tender age bracket.

In conclusion, parents being best the teachers and closest to their children need to teach high moral values to refrain their kids from bad actions. However, I opine that role of parents is the most crucial in the grooming of their kids and they should be held accountable for their off springs actions.

Votes
Average: 6.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 dirjavad 88 view
2020-01-21 Behnaz fallah 88 view
2020-01-20 emchawia 55 view
2020-01-17 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-16 jenifer 55 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Anonymous (not verified) :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'preach the best'.
Suggestion: preach the best
..., parents are the best teachers and can preach best ethical values and inculcate good moral...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23758865248 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0053374547 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8441212712 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.615384615 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3076923077 7.25397266985 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458721925524 0.242375264174 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.224119757446 0.0925447433944 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127027163101 0.071462118173 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343090148793 0.151781067708 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117466489069 0.0609392437508 193% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.