Parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done. What is your opinion, support with example?
The importance of legally responsible for what their children have done, which was always debatable has become more controversial. The substantial influence of handling children act by their parents has sparked the controvery over the potential impacts of this trend on society in recent years. It can be said that parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done.
At the outset, there are numerious reasons why the parents are totaly responsible for the children act, but the most conspicious one lies from the fact that children makes mistake knowingly or unknowlingly but it harms for all. For example, a research conducted in charles Darwin University had found that the children likes to do unneccessar and unwanted things apart from what they are told to do. Furthermore, Children are act in the society may cause or harm other people or things in the society. Thus, should take social responsibility of their chindren.
Nevertheless, there remains the same drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of taking legal responsiblity of children by their parents, but the most conspicious one is rooted from the fact that freedom of children should not be restricted. AS an illustration, we try to force our children to study rather than playing, which is a kind of restriction to children. Moreover, children can perform from their best ability if there is no restriction. Thus freesom should be given to children.
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that the parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done is prominent, but the freedom of their children should be well managed and considered carefully.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 473, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...est ability if there is no restriction. Thus freesom should be given to children. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, apart from, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24087591241 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88929414778 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540145985401 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.4866166975 50.4703680194 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.473967957974 0.242375264174 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.205800693829 0.0925447433944 222% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183679454041 0.071462118173 257% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.354306961623 0.151781067708 233% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160838447886 0.0609392437508 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.