Shouls individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment?
The important effect of individual limit the use of car and should use alternative things instead of protect environment was always debatable has now become more controversal. The substantial influence of individual should use less personal car and should use public transport to protect environment has sparkede the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in less use of car and use of public vehicle in recent year. It can be agreed that everyone should more public vehicle instead of personal car to protect the environment pollution because it helps to make the peace and beautiful natural invironment.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why people should use alternative things instead of using car but the most conspicious one steam's from the fact that alternative vehicles helps to reduce smoke in atomosphare and sound pollution. As an illustration less use of car helps to get easily parking in every shooping mall, park. Current research in America shows that the place of Ciago was more polluted due to increase of personal use of car in 2018. In adittion, alternative use of other vehicles helps to preserve the beautiful environment. Thus, everyone should be careful to protect the environment by less using of car.
Another key of justification for upholding this notion is that less use of car is more benifical for peace and beautiful environment. For instance, people should be more concern about to use alternative things rather than use of car. Thus, less use of car makes the environment quite, clean and peace.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of people should less use of car instead of using more personal car is prominent, which helps to increase the natural beauty of country and the torusim sector increased.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e it can be concluded that the impact of people should less use of car instead of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06734006734 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75350068693 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451178451178 0.580463131201 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8281381809 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.58333333333 7.25397266985 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.525821979916 0.242375264174 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.244810448122 0.0925447433944 265% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126535528433 0.071462118173 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362153967583 0.151781067708 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112579957527 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.