People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology. What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, the technology influences on society have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "What are the effects of technology on individual and society?" Whereas it is a widely held view that technology is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, technology is bound up inextricably with electronic business, which indicates they lead to both less paper money and less directs contacts. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between online shopping and modern technologies as well as an exponential increase in electronic banking. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of financial transactions is correlated positively with not only cash-less society but also time-saving.
Within the realm of social-psychology, without the slightest doubt, indirect communication attribute to biosocial behaviors, in that it would come down to individual life, face to face conversation, and electronic society. A salient example of such attribution is card-less banking systems, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take security issues for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint internet problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to online searching, wholesale trading, and even new technology. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of modern technology.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that advantages of technology are more than disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | epouei | 85 | view |
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important do you think i 85
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one's career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details an 85
- Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions? 11
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you most ag 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87412587413 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33970815271 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 139.433497537 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.678321678322 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.1428535156 50.4703680194 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.0 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138185662433 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038895783211 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393150030184 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723341895946 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301813053205 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 55.0591133005 205% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 23.0 9.94827586207 231% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.