People should stop giving to charities because they don’t know where their money ends up.
Giving money to the people who can’t support themselves is a good thing and charities helps to do these tasks but, there is an ongoing debate about the transparency of these charities. While some think people should give money to charities, others argue the use of these charities if they don’t do the task. This essay will discuss why we should do a background check before giving money to these charities.
People should avoid of giving money to the charities which rob these money without giving them to poor. This will make people who run the charities rich but won’t do any good. For example, research has shown that some charities give only about 5 percent of what they receive. In sum, it is a bad idea to giving to charities which have not got a transparency.
In contrast, people should give money to charities as it will help some disable or homeless guy who can’t afford himself. There thousands of people who need support lives in any city and it is our responsibility to help them. For example, every person who has a decent job can help another helpless guy which will make this world a better place. In short, people should try to help others when they have a chance.
This essay discussed why it is important to give money to charities even though the transparency of some countries can’t be accepted. In my opinion, people always try to give money to charities after conducting a thorough background check.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this money' or 'these moneys', 'these monies'?
Suggestion: this money; these moneys; these monies
...giving money to the charities which rob these money without giving them to poor. This will ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, for example, in contrast, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.75862068966 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1207.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80876494024 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57141609994 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505976095618 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1334310798 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 92.8461538462 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333458542034 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149035643275 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860998006443 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234284423298 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494421681558 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.32886699507 84% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 55.0591133005 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.