People should take part in sports either in individual or in teams, because people can learn many useful skills. How far do you agree? Explain and use examples or your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning many vital skills by doing sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Many people regard that the matter of handling pressure even in an individual sport is highly constructive. I am also inclined to believe that teamwork in a sport and its principles can be a plus, and I will analyze all aspects throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, participating in a team sport can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of collaboration, as well as group discipline, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I played in my university’s basketball team, I had to conform to the team's rules. Consequently, all of these skills are so useful in my personal and workplace. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both establishing order in life and working with others apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, even individual exercise increases the consequences of tackling pressure and accepting defeat. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of unsuccessful people could relate to this reality that the demerits of not accepting failures as part of life pertain to the lack of enough practice. For example, according to many studies undertaken by some prestigious universities, many athletes are also successful in their personal life. The reason is, they have to learn from their failures and try again to achieve their goals. As a result, this method can be a brilliant lifestyle.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments, I profoundly believe that the benefits of taking part in sport far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of complying with rules prove the significance of teamwork in the workplace, but also pinpoint accepting failure in a real-life implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27551020408 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14008218926 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602040816327 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0139068327 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.785714286 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225571612348 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668602468565 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042344618751 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121030898775 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382244302382 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.