Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of paying more to professional workers than sports and entertainment personalities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of professional workers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that having a great contribution to the society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, the matter that professional workers should get more money than entertainment personalities can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of different professions, as well as critical jobs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of different carriers. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both monthly salary and regular payment apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, understanding the great contributions of professional workers to the society might increase the consequences of low salary. Moreover, fundamental aspects of amateur workers can relate to this reality that demerits of not having job experience pertain to celebrities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of temporary jobs is correlated negatively with low efficiency. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unskilled workers.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the significant contributions that professional workers have for the society far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a full-time job prove the significance of high salary, but also pinpoint job efficiency implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-08-06 ferferi 88 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74226804124 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4009196597 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7933287892 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.25 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199666275083 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646011438575 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597197524362 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115452613049 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435961510529 0.0609392437508 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.