Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently, the phenomenon of paying more attention to theoretical knowledge than practical training and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of theoretical courses is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that practical training can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, the significance of spending more time on practical training than theoretical courses can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of college members, as well as high school students, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered curricular activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both learning science and attending laboratories apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, the impact of too much theoretical courses in universities might increase the consequences of final exam pressure. Moreover, fundamental aspects of school assignment can relate to this reality that demerits of not skilled students pertain to the lack of talent. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of state universities is correlated negatively with learning skill. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of educational principles.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of having practical lessons more than theoretical courses far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of graduated students prove the significance of having a scientific field, but also pinpoint professional tutors' implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-20 yasamin.gharib62 85 view
2019-07-28 maryam2 80 view
2019-02-18 MehdiKhodadadi 88 view
2018-12-12 arami 88 view
2018-11-07 Krishn Patel 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78798586572 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27138259566 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628975265018 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8878805698 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186495478936 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581365099423 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496618336495 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10395013659 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289502898625 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.