A recent trend in the entertainment world is to adapt classic works of literature for either TV or the movies One argument is that this is to everyone s benefit as it introduces people to works they might otherwise never have experienced while others say

Now-a-days the trend of picturizing art or literature work on screen has become famous. However, some people think that the idea of making project work like movie or series is not good and can’t work but I am totally disagreeing with the statement and I believe that, making movie of literature or on any history, story is good notion. On my argument, I’ll discuss in the essay and conclude with a perfect reason.

Firstly, the people who is thinking that literature should not be translate to screen might be thinking that the artist or the producer can’t success to make it original as writer has did. But I’ll like say that the technology is changed and it will be easy if the imagination of the director or artist is good. For example: Harry Potter is a good example, the movie was made from a story of imagination and it became a successful series.

In other hand, the person who think it is possible to do that might be thinking that the person who is not good for the visual understanding people. Apart from this by summarizing the whole story it can just complete for few i.e. two to three hours move which also save the time of people alone with the entertainment. However, I also think that artist hasn’t live such life so it would be quite difficult but once the project take place than cost can do anything.

In conclusion, I suppose that it is good idea and there is not any issue and it can be done effectively. So I think adopting classical literature on TV or silver screen can be beneficial for all.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (4 votes)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s is not good and can't work but I am totally disagreeing with the statement and I believe that, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
...ccess to make it original as writer has did. But I'll like say that the techno...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, apart from, for example, i suppose, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6268115942 5.00649968141 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63573696066 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.2478971318 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.090909091 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154221993902 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0629231127068 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414529783835 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0976671217758 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412033612793 0.0609392437508 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.1260098522 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.