Right amount of motivation and practice can train better than classroom training. What is your opinion? Provide relevant examples.
Nowadays, having enough incentive for studying has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether the right amount of motivation is sufficient for learning or attending in the classroom is necessary?”. It is a widely held view that frequent practice is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief the right amount of practice and motivation play a vital role in the cut-throat competition. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that students can reach the summit of prosperity by stimulating their idea and abilities as well reinforcing their talent. Secondly, it can be argued that hardworking, devoted attempt, making the adequate effort, and theoretical knowledge outweigh attending in the classroom. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that attending in class is time-consuming, so students are able to promote their motivation and open their mind to new ideas by trying endlessly and choose a precise plan to reach to their aspirational goal.
However, there is no doubt that attending in class instead of provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that those who participate in class are more sociable and have this opportunity to complete their assignment in a group and promote their teamwork ability. Moreover, it is quite clear that they can share their interests and findings and interact face to face.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that making more effort, having frequent practice, and acquire enough motivation in order to reach prosperity must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nough incentive for studying has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 20.9802955665 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 312.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30769230769 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0437244802 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.4636067648 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113886723628 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0420767619588 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434568333303 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636913656679 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363208536303 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.