Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not penalize unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.
Which view do you support?
Since the beginning of the 21st century, due to increasing number of cars, governments have chosen alternative methods to enforce car drivers to follow driving regulations and consequently reducing the number of accidents. one of this regulation was imposing fines on unsafe drivers. Some people believe that penalizing unsafe drivers is the right solution to make roads more safer, while others argue that safe drivers deserve rewards for their safe driving. This essay will discuss the reasons why governments should penalize unsafe drivers regardless the behavior of safe drivers.
Governments should penalizing unsafe drivers because their behaviors affect significantly on other lives. Safe drivers are exposed to dangerous injuries due to careless of unsafe drivers. Recent research, which was conducted in the Cambridge university, has shown that 95% of cars accidents are happened because of driving in higher speed more than the allowed speed, which led to increasing number of deaths by 30%. Therefore, it seems clear that governments should impose more fines to change the behavior of unsafe driver and protect other drivers lives.
On the other hand, some people think that safe drivers deserve rewards for their safe driving. Applying rewards motivates safe drivers to continue driving safe and they become a good model to be followed. But these people are unaware of the fact that number of safe drivers is very large which contrasts the number of unsafe drivers. Governments do not own the abilities to reward all the safe drivers. Thus, applying fines on unsafe drivers is very important to change their behavior.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why the governments should impose fined on unsafe drivers and should not reward safe drivers. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that applying fine on unsafe drivers is the best method to reduce the number of cars accidents and to protect road users lives.
- Poverty is a major issue world wide. Many charities exist to help collect monetary donations. Who should decide what the donations are spent on? The people in need or the charitable organizations?72
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers to not over-package products in the first place?Choose which side you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view w72
- Modern technology is now very common in most work places How do you think this has changed the way we work Do you think there are disadvantages to relying too much on technology86
- Gerontologists, people who study the process of ageing, are getting closer to finding a way to increase the human lifespan significantly. They claim that within the next few decades humans may be live for 500 years or more.would living for 500 years have 70
- Some effective people like repetitive routine, such as eating the same food, do you like this way?72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...ently reducing the number of accidents. one of this regulation was imposing fines o...
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE
Message: Use only 'safer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
...ers is the right solution to make roads more safer, while others argue that safe drivers d...
Line 7, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...idents and to protect road users lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1630.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 308.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29220779221 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53433996713 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480519480519 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8835978387 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.666666667 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422058483099 0.242375264174 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.174181733177 0.0925447433944 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785209195966 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299282516641 0.151781067708 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403657842507 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.