Road rules are generally enforced by fining people for infringements. Some people, however, believe that governments should not penalize unsafe drivers but reward safe drivers instead.
Which view do you support?
Traffic fines and penalties exist in almost all parts of the world. While some people argue that there is no improvement to overall road safety and compliance to traffic rules by penalizing the violators, others maintain that punishing drivers with traffic violations with hefty fines is actually necessary. This essay will discuss why it is prudent to impose fines for unsafe drivers rather than reward safe drivers.
The number of vehicles on the road has increased exponentially and this has eventually produced more and more drivers. If we decide to reward all safe drivers, the portion of reward each individual is going to get will be minuscule. Studies on human psychology show that there will be no respect or consideration for a reward which is of negligible size. Therefore, the idea of rewarding safe drivers instead of penalizing dangerous drivers will be a bad idea.
Despite the inevitable needs to enforce traffic rules, some people think that traffic fines are negative approach for enforcing road safety. What they don’t understand is that number of repeat traffic offenders is increasing year over year. For example, in the state of California itself, sixty percent of its annual traffic convictions were life-threatening offenses. This indicates that there is no reason to leave the traffic offenders unpunished.
There are conflicting views about enforcing traffic penalties. In my opinion, penalizing unsafe drivers is a better approach than rewarding safe drivers.
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believe that there is a limit to the tasks that robots can perform Choose which position you most agree wit 84
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 72
- The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? (72) 55
- The violence portrayed on T.V and in the movies leads to an increase in crime in our society. People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals. Do you agree or disagree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1262.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37021276596 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80307016573 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578723404255 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3513061911 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0769230769 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76923076923 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294319802379 0.242375264174 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101192898444 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809131547672 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186901520966 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572068526096 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.