shopping moll

Essay topics:

shopping moll

The importance which was always debatable become other controversial other many people claiming. That it is beneficial while other reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over this potential in recent years. In my opinion the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and hus will lead to a logical conclusion .

There are myriad of reasons which was further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from fact that Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say all these merits stand in a good stead .

However there are some pitfalls that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential of this influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that Besides Hence it is apparent why many are against this trend .

According to the arguments aforementioned above one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of are instruments indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawback should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-06 Sridarani 75 view
2024-05-14 y.yousefi90@gmail.com 77 view
2024-05-14 y.yousefi90@gmail.com 77 view
2023-01-06 Yuli 84 view
2022-12-26 woutan 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 334, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and...
^^
Line 1, column 449, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd hus will lead to a logical conclusion . There are myriad of reasons which was...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'explained'.
Suggestion: explained
...are myriad of reasons which was further explain this argument but the most preponderant...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but the most preponderant one stems from fact that Another pivotal aspect of this...
^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y all these merits stand in a good stead . However there are some pitfalls that ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... these merits stand in a good stead . However there are some pitfalls that negate the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this argument' or 'these arguments'?
Suggestion: this argument; these arguments
...ver there are some pitfalls that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...some pitfalls that negate these argument and which can certainly overwhelm the po...
^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...apparent why many are against this trend . According to the arguments aforementi...
^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...awback should not be overlooked either.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 1207.87684729 78% => OK
No of words: 179.0 242.827586207 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24581005587 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.92707691288 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76895275946 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 139.433497537 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603351955307 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 379.143842365 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0192872172 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.33497536946 187% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.