should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner and reduce overcrowding in cities or improve the network of public transports?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that should government build more roads to allow more vehicle. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that should government should build more roads to allow more vehicle cannot contribute to developed more roads to control traffic system, but also lead to numerous other benefits of various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it come to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one is good stead, as far as augmenting their choices of prosperity and excellence is considered.
There are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner and reduce overcrowding in cities. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trends, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions, when it comes to today’s ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on over crowd in the cities is far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent why many are against should government build more roads to allow more vehicle .
In view of my arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of traffic’s and over crowd control in cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 370, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
..., not only can one benefit more when it come to being effective, but they can also e...
^^^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t build more roads to allow more vehicle . In view of my arguments outlined above...
^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pos;s and over crowd control in cities.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03832752613 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79631833294 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0721340347 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 7.25397266985 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368447872433 0.242375264174 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142683493746 0.0925447433944 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.192082928537 0.071462118173 269% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207327845618 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150259835386 0.0609392437508 247% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.