Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing a fact that government should support projects to introduce more personal vehicles or to improve public transportation. Some people opine that building more roads for personal cars is the way to improve infrastructure of the country. Critics, however claim that serious attention towards improvement of public transport would welcome healthy lifestyle and develop sense of punctuality amongst citizens.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument associated with governments role in approving new projects for public transportation. Firstly, the most cospicuous one stem from the the fact that it develops sense of punctuality in passengers to move from one place to another. As a prime example, in some western societies, underground trains, and buses are the most suitable and cheapest mode of transport to travel. Moreover, walking distance to stations provides people a good health.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that public transport has its fix timings and routes to travel and gives an additional benefit to travelers to avoid heavy traffic on roads. As a result, people can reach their destination without trouble. Thus, public transport is the safest and cheapest mode to travel.
To recapitulate. foregoing discussion propounds that public transport is not suitable but , safest alternate for travel. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | lovedeepkaur2000 | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Shruti gupta radhika | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | manpreet9999 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | vahora juber | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | prabhdyal | 11 | view |
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 85
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 88
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 11
- . Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 79
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...stly, the most cospicuous one stem from the the fact that it develops sense of punctual...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...stly, the most cospicuous one stem from the the fact that it develops sense of punctual...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 18, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Foregoing
...est mode to travel. To recapitulate. foregoing discussion propounds that public transp...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...scussion propounds that public transport is not suitable but , safest alternate ...
^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...at public transport is not suitable but , safest alternate for travel. Thus, ide...
^^
Line 7, column 91, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the safest'.
Suggestion: , the safest
...at public transport is not suitable but , safest alternate for travel. Thus, ideas that ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... public transport is not suitable but , safest alternate for travel. Thus, ideas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49785407725 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89620337853 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622317596567 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3185151431 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4166666667 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253308786333 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735291817364 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0833669391189 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137085115592 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12372557071 0.0609392437508 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.