Should heritage buildings be preserved? Discuss your views.
Every country has their own heritage buildings. Many heritage buildings are becomes more old and old whereas some heritage building get ruined and these building have preserved for protecting it. So my opinion is yes these buildings get preserved. Further, I will discuss their both sides with its logical conclusion in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence there is no ambiguity to say that, every country has their own heritage buildings. Which is the symboitic symbol for them and now in this era heritage buildings get ruined which is very bad for historical history. Government should have preserved to structure of the heritage building for protect and keep in fame so that tourists can visit in historical places and learn about in history. Like Taj Mahal is a main historical symbol of india. Where tourist mostly like to visit
On the other hand, some people think that some heritage building get badly ruined and have a chance of fall it and dangerous for the people and society get harm from it. So they want to get new building structure over it and they think that people like to see new structures.
In conclusion, I would like to say that if we dispose historical buildings it get bad effect on history. because historical buildings get disposed day by day.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l is a main historical symbol of india. Where tourist mostly like to visit On the ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gets'?
Suggestion: gets
...t if we dispose historical buildings it get bad effect on history. because historic...
^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...buildings it get bad effect on history. because historical buildings get disposed day b...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...buildings it get bad effect on history. because historical buildings get disposed day b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55661210044 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537037037037 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.813192697 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6666666667 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220972213866 0.242375264174 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842785611809 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652833130478 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135431233072 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682793903346 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 55.0591133005 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.