Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things insteads to protect environment?
The important effect of individual should limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment which was always debatable has now become more controversal. The substaintial influence of individual should use less car to protect the environment has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in people should use of alternative things instead of car to protect of our surrounding in recent year. It can be agreed that less use of car helps to maintain the quiet environment and also it helps in global warming.
At the outset, there are numerous reason why people should use a alternative vehicle but the most conspicious one steam's from the fact that less use of car helps to reduce the sound pollution and air pollution in our surroundings. As an illustration, peoples can use alternative things in place of private car such as, train, public bus, boat etc which is benificial to city. In adittion, less use of private car also helps to get easily parking in public place, shopping mall. Thus, less use of car helps to protect the environment and which may increase the tourism of a country.
Neverthless, there remains same drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of individual should use less personal car but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that if there is no personal car with people it takes longer time to reached the destination. For instance, a recent study shows in America a people do not have a personal car, he reached late to the office, he was suspended from work.
From what has been discussed above it can be concluded that the impact of less car use should is prominent although the way of more using private car should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 64, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e numerous reason why people should use a alternative vehicle but the most conspi...
^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
... that the impact of less car use should is prominent although the way of more usin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84615384615 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72161493218 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478260869565 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.3077482868 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.9 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9 20.9669160288 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.563329562079 0.242375264174 232% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.261799707151 0.0925447433944 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179088562415 0.071462118173 251% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.358203174427 0.151781067708 236% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205912806851 0.0609392437508 338% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.1260098522 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.