Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that usage of digital gadgets in libraries for knowledge acquisition is beneficial for people. Critics, however, claim that old and traditional ways of reading books from libraries is proficient way to grasp knowledge. In my opinion, former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, we shall highlight some of the pros and cons of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there rae myriad of argument discussing the fact that latest digital gadgets in libraries are more proficient source of gathering information. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that in this contemporary world, technological advancements have made things quiet simple and an easy access to every one. Moreover, traditional books have largely been replace by E-books and other digital gadgets. Therefore, libraries have set this trend of introducing E-books to provide a lot of information to readers. As a prime example, various nations across the world have adapted this trend of replacing printed version of books with E-books to provide maximum knowledge to readers.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that printed books have their own values. The most important one is visual learning ability of readers which is quiet strong with hard copies of books. In addition, despite easy access of E-book at every where, the traditional methods of reading habits at libraries are more valuable for early readers.
To recapitulate, the aforementioned propounds that digital gadgets in libraries are not only more feasible and suitable method of studying but also it promotes reading habits of readers. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | marsh | 80 | view |
| 2019-05-18 | Pavitra Kumari | 77 | view |
| 2019-05-08 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-03-16 | neelu sharma | 80 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 88
- Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago? 77
- In town and cities the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop Do you agree or disagree 93
- . In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ieve. In this essay, we shall highlight some of the pros and cons of this statement before ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 306, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'easy access'.
Suggestion: easy access
...ments have made things quiet simple and an easy access to every one. Moreover, traditional boo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'replaced'.
Suggestion: replaced
...er, traditional books have largely been replace by E-books and other digital gadgets. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...ition, despite easy access of E-book at every where, the traditional methods of reading hab...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42049469965 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78150909004 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575971731449 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1272779216 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.571428571 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149918070525 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513535810413 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510882536561 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900366276942 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041473079178 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.