In some countries, the number of shootings increases because many people have guns at home. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Recently, increasing the number of shootings has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "who is responsible to deal with issue?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is because of increasing guns at home in many countries, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the government standpoint, incident shootings are bound up inextricably with weapon, which indicates they lead to both atomic and tactical bombs. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between policy conflict and war as well as an exponential increase in violence. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of nuclear energy is correlated positively with not only strategic planning but also wrong leadership.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, increasing of shootings attribute to criminal rate, in that it would come down to juvenile crime, corporal punishment, and incarcerate. A salient example of such attribution is developed country, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take human right activity for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint uncontrolled gun license problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to military mission, street crime, and even countries' boundaries. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of legislatures, government and police.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that more measurement must be taken into account. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-08-16 | mojtaba1980 | 88 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | cccchinu | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | alexanderone | 55 | view |
| 2019-01-03 | alexanderone | 55 | view |
- With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of living in an era in which new things are constantly being invented? 85
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). 88
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the government standpoint, incident...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lanning but also wrong leadership. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gislatures, government and police. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73263888889 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13507442454 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.704861111111 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0785570355 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139259400006 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398299952317 0.0925447433944 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504863775274 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077391351052 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657151343417 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.