Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions?
Recently, the impact of international travel and tourism in making people prejudiced has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what steps must be taken to challenge this issue?". Whereas it is a widely held view that tourism and international travelling have positive effects, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, travelling are bound up inextricably with different counties, which indicates they lead to both life experience and famous places. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between growing tourists and tourism industry as well as an exponential increase in revenue. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of cultural value is correlated positively with not only thinking way but also changing lifestyle.
Within the realm of tourism sector, without the slightest doubt, international travel attribute to travelling expenditure, in that it would come down to economic profit, development, and declining migration. A salient example of such attribution is foreign language, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take native speakers for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint tourism problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to creative thinking, agile mind, and even unlimited knowledge. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of travelling agency, tour leaders and government finance.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that several measurements must be implemented to solve this problem. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | dalwindergill | 11 | view |
- Students with degree earn high salary than who doesn't have an academic qualification. Therefore, some argue that they have to pay the full cost of their courses. Give your opinion? 88
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 85
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 77
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss 88
- Should company top level authorities take employees’ suggestions while making any decisions? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the social standpoint, travelling a...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g way but also changing lifestyle. Within the realm of tourism sector, with...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ur leaders and government finance. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88698630137 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13631326153 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698630136986 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2075612425 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0481061060545 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0131974068982 0.0925447433944 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0262362450512 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0304191362633 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242096921495 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.