Some developing countries invite large multinational companies to open offices and factories in order to help their economy. However, others feel that foreign companies should be shut out and instead the government should help the local companies to contribute to the economic growth. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, an invitation to large multinational companies by the developing government has raised an outgoing controversy, whether MNCs should be supported or ignored is an irrefutable debate. I firmly believe that MNCs must be invited by local government and this essay will illustrate both sides of arguments.
To begin with, large multinational companies provide a plethora of opportunities and employment to the local people, it boosts country's economy and train citizens with the latest technologies. People get more payout as compare to the local companies and their lifestyle and buying power improved significantly. MNCs create competition in the local market by creating a positive vibe among the entrepreneurs and responsible for introducing new technology in the local market. MNCs also open doors for local businessmen to support their own business
and flourish other small vendors. For instance, in 1980, Suzuki collaborated with Maruti, an Indian car manufacturing company and invested heavily and invited other small vendors to support Maruti Suzuki by manufacturing parts of cars like accessories, wire, bolts etc resulting significant boom in the local economy and plenty of employment opportunities.
Further, there might be some disadvantages, for instance, small vendors cannot survive the competition with large corporates but the local government can also create policies to integrate local vendors with large corporations.
To sum up, given the preceded argument, it is safe to say that large multinational companies must be invited to help and flourish the local economy by opening offices. Thus, given the opportunities and the economic advantages, the negative sides can be easily outweighed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 122, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ment has raised an outgoing controversy, whether MNCs should be supported or igno...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for instance, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 258.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70930232558 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1603791726 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581395348837 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.2460893752 50.4703680194 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.3 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29785116371 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116560014855 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690372587733 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150587412798 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487985973167 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.