Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking.
Some individual’s opinion that subjects like chemistry, physics and history should be taught at secondary level. However, others state that practical subjects need more emphasis rather than theoretical subjects like motor mechanics and cooking. In this essay, there will be an examination on both sides of contention, before deducing an even handed conclusion.
To commence with, subjects like chemistry, mathematics and physic are source of basic knowledge of science principles those are applicable in day to day life rather than becoming superstitions. To cite an example, if people will know that concept of eye flicking due to tension in vein, they will not consider these thinks as a sign of good or bad luck. Nonetheless, it is pointless to teach practical knowledge because not everybody wants to do a job in future.
On the flip side, practical subjects are very beneficial for students. Students can acquire a jobs after completing their primary study, only if they have practical knowledge. Moreover, they will become independent and help their parents finically. Nevertheless, some people prefer part time jobs, so they can complete their higher study as well. I think this is good for those people to abstain practical knowledge.
To recapitulate, practical and academic subjects have their own importance, I believe that more emphasis should be given to those subjects those are really worthwhile in real life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-05 | neethujithin | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-20 | neelu sharma | 85 | view |
| 2018-12-16 | arami | 100 | view |
| 2018-09-28 | Alka | 80 | view |
| 2018-08-06 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 85 | view |
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics, and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. 77
- As E books are available online these days the value of printed books has diminished Agree or disagree 72
- Problem and benefits for high school students study plays and work of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 11
- In today’s world, different government and international organizations are confronting many global problems. What is the most pressing problem among them and give solutions? 70
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: IN_VEIN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'in vain' (=unsuccessfully)?
Suggestion: in vain
... concept of eye flicking due to tension in vein, they will not consider these thinks as...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...because not everybody wants to do a job in future. On the flip side, practical subject...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a job' or simply 'jobs'?
Suggestion: a job; jobs
...cial for students. Students can acquire a jobs after completing their primary study, o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...cally. Nevertheless, some people prefer part time jobs, so they can complete their higher...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nevertheless, nonetheless, really, second, so, well, while, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40444444444 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91406465946 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6725310791 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264726482038 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0869990050716 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648386095067 0.071462118173 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155917315158 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068939311629 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.