Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?

One of the most conspicuous trend in world is colossal upsurge in investment in field of art, music and painting. However, some people thinks that it only leads to myriad of concerns. I strongly believe that investment in these fields induce plethora of opportunities for people. In this essay, there will be an examination of contention, before deducing an even handed conclusion.

To commence with, there is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. Investments in these creative fields create several chances for people to flourish in these fields nationally or internationally. Moreover, every person has their own choices regarding choosing their field to shine in this world. Some masses find that these fields give them peace and satisfaction of mind so they do not able to do anything else.

Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that music and painting are mediums to express feeling of person so this field requisites investments. To site an example, Australia invest their 30 percent of budget to support these art work and results shows that improvement in people artistic sense increased by 50 percent.

Agglomerating the above elaborated points, one can reiterate that investment in art field are indeed yet too great to marginlizied. Legislation should enrich their investments so people can enhance their skills.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 manraj123 70 view
2020-01-29 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2020-01-29 manraj123 55 view
2020-01-28 manraj123 80 view
2020-01-27 Alireza.r.68 88 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Manjeet Sidhu :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, regarding, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26511627907 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88250537021 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646511627907 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 344.7 379.143842365 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.8453188215 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.3333333333 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.25397266985 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158203358281 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599533240837 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0657513274795 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103162664018 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388096119294 0.0609392437508 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 12.6369458128 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.