Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spent solving immediate problems here on Earth.
Recently, the phenomenon of the exploring of outer space and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that expands of human knowledge is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the travelling outer space can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the experts of space standpoint, the exploring of outer space can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that human knowledge, as well as benefit humanity's future, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the growth of human' knowledge. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both scientific subjects and the discoveries of mystery apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the economy of society, the exploring might increase the consequences of knowledge. Moreover, fundamental aspects of wasting money related to this reality that the demerits of the problems of earth pertain to wasting money in exploring space. As tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiment is correlated negatively with the management of money. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of science.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of exploring of outer space far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of expanding of human knowledge prove the significance of discoveries, but also pinpoint the future implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kbalavenka | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
- Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion. 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 455, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...egatively with the management of money. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 309, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... also pinpoint the future implications.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52044609665 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16652258801 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602230483271 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8016361947 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.379429368993 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110838703623 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760153292253 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20725702176 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0332486143963 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.