Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisement in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advertising in school is a great resource for public schools, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the placing of advertising in public schools can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From economist standpoint, advertisements can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that earning money, as well as job, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered great resource of money and jobs. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both additional funding and careers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, the advertising in public schools might increase the consequences of the needing of additional funding. Moreover, fundamental aspects of exploits children by treating related to this reality that the demerits of placing advertising in public schools pertain to a captive audience for sponsors. As tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of practical experiments is correlated negatively with the treating of children. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of culture.
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the placing advertising in public schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of additional funding prove the significance of money and jobs, but also pinpoint a great resources for public schools implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 85
- Some people think that it is better for children to learn a foreign language at primary school. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 288, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...ney and jobs, but also pinpoint a great resources for public schools implications.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57608695652 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21927375078 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586956521739 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1070615838 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.25 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.392781677559 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130713749684 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105100988821 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226978972189 0.151781067708 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102091431542 0.0609392437508 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.