Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of employees’ involvement in decision making policy and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the making of employees’ conversation for the progression of the company is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I inclined to believe that the involvement of employees in decision making policy can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From sociologists’ standpoint, the taking part of recruitments in decision making can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the raising of employees’ motivation, as well as the positive effects on efficiency of workers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered motivation. Thus, the beneficial ramifications both efficiency and the performance of employees apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the modern management, the motivating of recruitments might increase the consequences of employees’ performance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the decision making policy relate to this reality that the demerits of the progression of the company pertain to the head of company. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the head of management’s company is correlated negatively with its behavior with employees. Hence, It’s correct to presume the preconceived the notion of the employees’ involvement in decision making policy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employees’ involvement far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the modern management prove the significance of the taking part for progression of companies, but also pinpoint new management implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | engr.sajjad55@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-04 | Armidat | 77 | view |
| 2018-08-13 | sara malla | 77 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? 85
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? 11
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1758.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.65467128785 2.71678728327 135% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 379.143842365 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.2327175919 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.5 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246601663375 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921980859485 0.0925447433944 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060587542786 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147307293595 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639497570412 0.0609392437508 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.