Some people believe, limiting the speed is the best way for the road safety, while other believe there are other ways to do this. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of road safety and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of reducing the number of killed passengers is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that speed limitation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a safety standpoint, speed controlling can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that detecting road hazards, as well as compensation of accidents, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered considerable reduction in accidents. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both speed cameras and driving fine apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, restriction might increase the consequences of intemperate behavior in driving. Moreover, fundamental aspects of strict rules relate to this reality that the demerits of limiting schemes pertain to the characteristics and culture of the people. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the proficiency of these facilities is correlated negatively with stringent limiting. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of non-beneficial tools.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of considering a limitation far outweigh its drawbacks. It do the advantages of observation and controlling prove the significance of the reduction of the road fatalities, besides pinpoint the increase of the reliability of roads implications.
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 11
- Some people believe, limiting the speed is the best way for the road safety, while other believe there are other ways to do this. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 72
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 85
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72161172161 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47790190118 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8878393195 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.166666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151656685981 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465303894251 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394733550421 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0843395983981 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337350931824 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.