Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not?

Essay topics:

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not?

Recently, the phenomenon of looking for a rule model and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of imitation is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the scrutiny of positive characteristics can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, The most frequently stressed cause is that lots of movie stars or sport champions have been such a hard worker that it could be useful to know how they have fulfilled their dreams and what they have done for their achievements particularly. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered motivation of youngsters to try more for gaining successes. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both being wisely capable of planning and improving general health status apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, it has taken its toll on adolescences in some cases. Sometimes the truth about stars is different from what is shown in media. For instance, many of them suffer from ethical disorders or harmful addictions. This may lead the young fans to being exposed to risk and arouse a concern for parents..
As expressed, I profoundly believe that the benefits of finding impressive ethical features far outweigh its drawbacks Although, it’s of importance to young people to find the stars who put the positive impacts on their life and the people around them, it must be recognized by parents that to what extent they are able or talented in that way.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-05 gobindh Singh 77 view
2019-10-28 Jasmaansingh1996 72 view
2019-07-28 dilroop 55 view
2019-07-03 edsonsimoes 55 view
2019-06-08 surinder bakipuria 55 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...n provide the society with a noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the e...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 425, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... on the development of the destination. Thus the beneficial ramification of both del...
^^^^
Line 2, column 527, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eing states and meeting the requirements of citizenship support apparently can be...
^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
...igrants might increase the consequences.Moreover, fundamental aspects of unemployment re...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.8 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50447104831 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.770975662 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.272727273 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9090909091 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.041975039558 0.242375264174 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0154121657673 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0235429758633 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0249680224883 0.151781067708 16% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111626464165 0.0609392437508 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.