Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community. They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole.
Recently, the phenomenon of doing unpaid work and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that volunteer works are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that outstanding jobs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, youth working can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that job opportunities, as well as learning new skills, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that this is a golden opportunity to experience difficult activities. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both mental and social growth apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of work experience, learning different skills might increase consequences of being expert. Moreover, fundamental aspects of social activities related to this reality that the demerits of wasting time pertain to diverse projects they will cope. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of the unemployment rate is correlated negatively with not having adequate knowledge and experience. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of intellectual abilities.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of volunteer careers outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being perfect prove the significance of being qualified, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6953125 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25465411949 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6796875 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4300203392 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172992418644 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549831404956 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307949717166 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973536656024 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260852534119 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.