Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Recently, the issue of car banning in large cities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Should cars be removed from urban areas?". Whereas it is a widely held view that banning cars can be a practical solution to solve large cities problems, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, car pollutants are bound up inextricably with burning fossil fuels, which indicates that they lead to both environmental pollution and industrial cities. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between the public transportation and commuting as well as an exponential increase in electric cars. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented so far supports the contention that likelihood of crowded cities is correlated positively with not only the air pollution but also noise pollution and streets's capacity.
Within the realm of society and economy, without the slightest doubt, cars prohibition attribute to less-crowded cities, in that it would come down to the resource efficiency, gas consumption reduction, and less expenditures on fossil fuels. A salient example of such attribution is streets' capacity, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take broadening streets for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint overcrowding problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of promoting hybrid cars in large cities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying gores, "all's well that ends well, " after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that banning cars from large cities would be beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | smb.arami | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | neelu sharma | 75 | view |
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 88
- Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 85
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
- in many countries, the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Does this trend have more positive or negative effects on the society? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expenditures is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...iciency, gas consumption reduction, and less expenditures on fossil fuels. A salient...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64259927798 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16393401276 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675090252708 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9545276292 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.090909091 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189979222794 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640244225036 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054877380494 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113326846454 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419521561698 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.