Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Essay topics:

Some people think that cars should be banned from large cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Recently, the idea of banning cars from large cities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that cars’ ban avoids environmental damages, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.

From the environmental standpoint, private vehicles is bound up inextricably with air pollution, which indicates it might lead to both carbon emissions and noxious gases. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between global warming and greenhouse effects as well as an exponential increase in single-occupant cars. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of mitigating climate change is correlated positively with not only car ownership restriction but also pedestrian-friendly cities.

Within the realm of society and economy, without the slightest doubt, imposing bans on cars attribute to transportation infrastructures, in that it would come down to public transit, automotive industry, and green taxes. A salient example of such attribution is traffic congestion, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take faster and comfortable transports for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint commuters’ problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of social policies in the car usage reduction.

To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well, ” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that cars must be banned partially from large cities.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-10-18 smb.arami 77 view
2019-08-28 foadihasan 77 view
2019-01-21 neelu sharma 75 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user mehrabi.leila :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78195488722 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.41358351791 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.725563909774 0.580463131201 125% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8560724223 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.818181818 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170088959827 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539950126114 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462318650853 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102191893734 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402176118482 0.0609392437508 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.