Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
The practice of group activities is believed to be key factor for the development of the intellectual skills. This essay will discuss why interaction and knowledge exchange can dramatically increase intellectual skills.
Firstly, Group activities are practices which contribute significantly for the increase of intellectual skills. People who are involved in group activities have shown improvements on their analytical skills and cognitive system. High school students, for example, who are constantly exchanging knowledge with other students and teachers. As a result of this, their intellectual skills have increased dramatically.
Secondly, group activities usually requires interaction with another people with different backgrounds. Individuals who interact with others expand rapidly the ability to process large amount of data. Such as, chess groups which encourage people to play chess and develop strategies. Obviously, interaction contribute significantly to evolve intellectual skills.
To sum up, group activities are known to increase intellectual skills throughout different aspects. In my opinion, the enhancement of intellectual skills are connected with group activities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 20.9802955665 24% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 1207.87684729 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 242.827586207 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.29268292683 5.00649968141 126% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.92707691288 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22362080779 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 139.433497537 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59756097561 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 379.143842365 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 13.2727791614 50.4703680194 26% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.0 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 20.9669160288 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154965478265 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691287290745 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504826104818 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10665276029 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442252251474 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.9 53.1260098522 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.61 11.5310837438 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.