Some people think personal car is the best way to travel within cities, while others think bicycles are better.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Transportation has proven to be an integral part of city dwellers’ lives. While some believe using private vehicles is more suitable for short travels within cities, others point out that bicycles are probably a better means of transportation. This essay will discuss both sides of this argument in detail, and why using private cars is ultimately superior.
Bicycles are without any doubt an efficient means of transportation, especially for city residents. While the majority of megacities are affluent by traffic congestion, riding bicycle appears to be a good idea so as to evade probable traffic jams. This is especially the case for individuals commuting to their workplace on a daily basis. New York citizens, for instance, can save more than 4 hours over a month period should they substitute their cars with bicycles for taking short travels. Apart from time-saving, cyclists often argue that riding bicycles can dramatically boost one’s physical health; thus, it is advisable to follow a healthier transportation means. Riding bicycles instead of driving cars, particularly in metropolitan cities, arguably offer citizens the opportunity not to waste their precious time in traffic streams as well as elevate their health condition.
Although a sizeable number of people thoroughly advocate the idea of using bicycles rather than cars for urban journeys, not everyone shares the same idea. In fact, cars tend to be ideal means for many when it comes to travels within cities. Indisputably, driving cars while you are living in a city usually facing harsh weather conditions is far more convenient compared to riding bicycles. Cars are originally designed to provide their passengers with a pleasurable atmosphere, protecting them from probable inconveniences, such as torrential rain. Moreover, only a few cities have vital safety infrastructures for cyclists, like specified bicycle lanes. This lack of sufficient developments persuades more people towards using their own cars since safety is of the high priority for most dwellers. Driving appears to be a pleasurable experience for those who put an emphasis on both safety and convenience.
Overall, taking all above-mentioned points into consideration, we can arrive at a concluding view that although many cite that bicycles are healthier and more time efficient, there is another group arguing that cars are better in terms of convenience. In my opinion, using cars in short trips would be a superior experience to riding bicycles.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...iding bicycle appears to be a good idea so as to evade probable traffic jams. This is es...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun cite seems to be countable; consider using: 'many cites'.
Suggestion: many cites
...rive at a concluding view that although many cite that bicycles are healthier and more ti...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, apart from, as to, for instance, in fact, in short, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2130.0 1207.87684729 176% => OK
No of words: 390.0 242.827586207 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46153846154 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 3.92707691288 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03287271358 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 139.433497537 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594871794872 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 379.143842365 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5455273515 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187984166035 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582077112658 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499815028974 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124544725087 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442746431287 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.