Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.
Recently, the phenomenon of placing advertisements in schools and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that commercial advertisements might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that outcomes of advertisements can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, school advertising can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that acquiring additional funds through advertisements, as well as getting a good opportunity for future, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a reasonable solution to help public schools. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both extracurricular facilities and reducing fee admissions apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of child psychology, false advertisements might increase the consequences of exploiting pupils. Moreover, fundamental aspects of such influence relate to this reality that the demerits of involving in various advertising campaigns lead to distracting juveniles. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of school advertising idea as a financing channel is correlated negatively with focusing on their studies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of total ban on advertising.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of setting up advertisements in schools far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of a key role that advertisements play in educational development, but also pinpoint the quality of education implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | kbalavenka | 80 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | a.aghyi1989 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | neethujithin | 55 | view |
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Essay topics: Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83098591549 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.55605214302 2.71678728327 131% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665492957746 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1126822273 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.0 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150618750116 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470935044455 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430411846069 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816243754569 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0147168794994 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.