Some people think women should be given equal chances to work and excel in their careers. Others believe that a woman’s role should be limited to taking care of the house and children. Which opinion do you agree with and why? Include specific details and examples to support your choice
Recently, women's right in regards to job opportunities has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "should women's role be limited to taking care of the house and children?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is correct, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the public perspective standpoint, women's roles are bound up inextricably with family, which indicates they lead to both caring children and house. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between employment and academic study as well as an exponential increase in graduation numbers. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of work chances is correlated positively with not only certification but also gender role.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, inequality attribute to general notion, in that it would come down to office, community, and university. A salient example of such attribution is kindergarten, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take household income for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint not minding to women rights problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to remote career, short distance offices, and even less working hours. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of mass media, increasing public awareness, and government facilities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that women should have equal chance for works. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
Recently, womens right in regards to job opportunities has sparked an ongoin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the public perspective standpoint, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ertification but also gender role. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reness, and government facilities. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66323024055 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09766319898 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701030927835 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1210200711 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.769230769 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240640224595 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651446303759 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831308483497 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137072853506 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071853648839 0.0609392437508 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.