The space travel is fantastic these days and people are very fascinated towards it but there are many environmental problems in our planet that need to be resolved first. What is your opinion? Should money be spent on space travel or on environmental issues?
Recently, the phenomenon of space travel and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of spending money on space technology is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that study of space exploration can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, funding on space program can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that unfolding the unsolved mysteries, as well as discovering the existence of life in another planet, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of extraterrestrial organisms on interstellar space. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both nearby galaxies and the Earth’ gravity apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, funding for space exploration might increase the consequences of black hole threat. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the space programs would relate to this reality that the demerits of discovering meteorites pertain to the satellite communication company. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the space shuttle is correlated negatively with pollution of the environment. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sending the satellite into space.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of funding for space exploration outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a telecommunication satellite prove the significance of space research centers, but also pinpoint practical implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1610.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70921985816 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34360120689 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9822190606 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.166666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192968110518 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652464024697 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267158690398 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108964187104 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473640689675 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.