In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Nowadays, the methods of examination have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether written examination can be a proper approach for assessing students or not?”. It is a widely held view that modern evaluation is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that education and an advanced curriculum that based on both written and new examination plays a vital role in each society. To put into consideration, I express some reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that in the written exam may some students perform well in the exam because of underlying knowledge while others may perform poor due to anxiety and stress. Secondly, it can be argued that other educational methods, such as oral presentation, team-work project, and multiple question exams help the test takers to promote their self-confidence as well as making more interaction as a group. In addition to this information, it should be mentioned that candidates will have more brain-storm as well as outstanding performance with new methods. A group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted that the rate of the prosperity of candidates has become increased by modern methods in recent years.
However, there is no doubt that written exam provides people with various positive points. It should be taken into account that written exam will make candidates to be evaluated in equal situations. Moreover, it is quite clear that students are not able to match them with the new content and the activity of numerous subjects.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that modern education instead of traditional methods must be taken into consideration. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... the methods of examination have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, while, in addition, no doubt, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 322.0 242.827586207 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24534161491 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01931880114 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593167701863 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9801670354 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7692307692 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0920646823416 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315822514477 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243472841925 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052980997361 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0170888694498 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.