Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding

Essay topics:

Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues, such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on. What are your views on the allocation of public funding?

Science has reach new heights in the past century making it possible to explore about our universe. Some people argue that it is pertinent to discover space while others do not agree to spend on space studies when other important issues such as environmental degradation exists. This essay will discuss how better understanding of the universe is beneficial for human kind.

To begin with, humans need to find alternative planets to survive in future as earth resources are being consumed at an alarming rate. When these resources are dried up human existence will be extinguished. Water especially clean water, for example has become an acute problem for the people thesedays as population has swelled in recent years. Thus, more funds should be allocated to study and find other planets to live on.

Also, space travelling has made human understand basic things about science which has brought a drastic change in the world. When people travel to space they have more chance to understand science better. For instance, concept of weightlessness was understood while travelling in space and it lead to many inventions in technology. Therefore, sufficient funds should be kept aside for space studies.

In conclusion, money spent on space studies will give a chance to find alternate place for humans to live as well as it will lead to advancement in technologies. In my opinion, more public funds should be dedicated to space travelling.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-04-15 vahidmetall 85 view
2020-12-02 Basil3241 75 view
2020-08-21 sattar_iust 88 view
2020-06-30 Gohar Khan 72 view
2020-05-19 Behnaz fallah 85 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...are being consumed at an alarming rate. When these resources are dried up human exi...
^^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rate. When these resources are dried up human existence will be extinguished. Wa...
^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... brought a drastic change in the world. When people travel to space they have more ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ange in the world. When people travel to space they have more chance to understan...
^^
Line 5, column 295, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
Suggestion: leads
...rstood while travelling in space and it lead to many inventions in technology. There...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1213.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16170212766 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74530423401 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621276595745 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8834068148 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3076923077 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0769230769 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0769230769 7.25397266985 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222267429255 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08179478767 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663311284392 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129275575929 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317171653871 0.0609392437508 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.