spending too much on their pets
The importance of spending too much on their pets which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is benefical while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my poinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that people throughout the world are struggling with hunger.Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that dogs are loyal and also very helpfull for people most people prefer to keep dogs at their home. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that sometime their aggresive behaviour leads many problems. Besides, people are not able to care about their. Hence, it is apparent why many are againts this trend.
According to the argumets aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of many rich people are spending too much on their pets are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Another
...ut the world are struggling with hunger.Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that do...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1236.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19327731092 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67159496813 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596638655462 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.7434097567 50.4703680194 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.363636364 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218698002835 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832140357295 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137538850442 0.071462118173 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151076412858 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11276097776 0.0609392437508 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.