Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree)
Since the beginning of the 21st century, youngsters have chosen different famous people as their role model. Some people believe that successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are considered the role model for the youngsters, while others argue that youngsters prefer scientists and writers as a model. This essay will discuss the reasons why sports stars and films stars are playing a crucial role in the youngsters lives and they are regarded as a role model for them.
Sports stars and films stars are a role model for the youngsters because they are shown on TV and in the newspaper regularly. Photos of famous stars attract the youngsters to consider them as a role model. Recent study, which was conducted in the Cambridge university, has shown that 96% of American people consider Lionel Messi as a role model for them, and they try to act similar to him in their lives. Therefore, it seems clear that successful sports stars and films
stars have a significant impact on the lives of the youngsters.
Secondly, sports stars and films stars are a role model for the youngsters because they collect a lot of money and they have a fun lives. Youngsters think these famous people are very happy and they don't face any problems in their lives. Recent study, which was conducted in Washington university, has shown that 86% of British youngsters follow the sports stars because they see them live exciting. Thus, successful sports stars and films stars affect on youngsters lives and behaviors.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the reason why youngsters consider the sports stars and films stars as a role model for them. In my opinion, I am inclined to believe that sports stars and films stars have a significant influence on the youngsters.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
2018-12-26 | hoandang | 77 | view |
2018-08-03 | Fiona Joanna Cruz | 72 | view |
- A recent study has shown that over 50% of school children cannot write legibly. The researchers concluded that the widespread use of smartphones, tablets and computers by children from as young as 12 months old was to blame. We are now living in a “post 73
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 77
- Nowadays TV has become an essential part of life Medium to spread news and awareness and for some it acts like a companion What is your opinion 56
- Violence portrayed on TV and in the movies leads to an increase in our society People who watch violent movies are more likely to become criminals Do you agree or disagree 89
- Artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. Some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots while others believes that there will be a limit to the tasks that robots can perform. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 200, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e famous people are very happy and they dont face any problems in their lives. Recen...
^^^^
Line 6, column 447, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...successful sports stars and films stars affect on youngsters lives and behaviors. In c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94949494949 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51739293164 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.400673400673 0.580463131201 69% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0477063309 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468066961208 0.242375264174 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.247011447515 0.0925447433944 267% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.13721873411 0.071462118173 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334865903743 0.151781067708 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962844821384 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.5310837438 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 55.0591133005 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 58.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.