Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
Nowadays, sports stars and film stars inspire younger people, which has attracted many controversies and drawn attention from the public. Some people agree that they play a vital role in building lives of younger ones, while on the other hand, stands a perspective that they damage our future talent. But in my opinion, these celebrities are true mentors in their lives. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are various reasons why sports stars and film stars are idols to younger ones. The most conspicuous one stems from the fact that they are a reflection of dedication, perseverance and motivation to them. As an illustration, many adolescents imitate these celebrities and learn life skills like never give up attitude. Moreover, their real-life experiences add teachings to their lives. Thus, there is no doubt that sports stars and film star’s life lessons are an inspiration to youngsters.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of these celebrities and the most alarming one roots from the fact that these celebrities sometimes are puffed up with pride. Furthermore, they engage themselves in unacceptable and anti-social activities. For instance, many sports stars resort to drugs to boost their performance and many adolescents follow them blindly. Hence, it shows that emulating sports stars and film stars have a negative impact on youngsters.
In the light of above discussion, it is concluded that the impact of sports stars and film stars is positive on our future generation and guides them to success.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generation and guides them to success.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, for instance, no doubt, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31178707224 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84409121405 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566539923954 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5170661951 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7857142857 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7857142857 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312883537464 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113110847879 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.132840690205 0.071462118173 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210239746907 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500051752237 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.