Do you think playing 'no smoking' cautionary videos in the film are relevant ?
In today's contemporary era, many changes have taken place in each and every sphere of life. These changes have also affected the thinking of people. Some people are of the view that playing 'no smoking' cautionary videos in the beginning of a film is irrelevant. But, in my opinion, such videos play a vital role.
To begin with, some people are of the view that playing videos with caution messages at the movie theatre are not required. They feel that these are not necessary and provokes the people to get into the habit of smoking. Moreover, they feel guilty and don't want others to judge them. Last, but not the least, some think that their mood gets spoiled after watching these videos.
On the other hand, some people bolster their arguments by stating that playing such videos is very important to spread awareness among people. The government should ensure that important messages are spread and theatre is the best medium to reach the wider public. Furthermore, in this way people get to know about the adverse effects of smoking and its effect on health.
To recapitulate, I would like to accentuate the fact that spreading awareness among people with the help of any medium is useful. This helps the individuals to live a healthy life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-16 | Rafia Jawad | 72 | view |
| 2024-09-04 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 79 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | y.yousefi90@gmail.com | 77 | view |
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 80
- Do you think playing no smoking cautionary videos in the film are relevant 63
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic ? Support your opinion with examples. 80
- he environment we are living is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think is responsible for this ? Is it governments, organization or each individual? What measures? 77
- Most artists earn low salaries and should, therefore, receive social welfare from governments in order for them to continue their work. Discuss the extent to which you would agree/disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/o 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinion, such videos play a vital role. To begin with, some people are of the vi...
^^^
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...smoking. Moreover, they feel guilty and dont want others to judge them. Last, but no...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s spoiled after watching these videos. On the other hand, some people bolster t...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s of smoking and its effect on health. To recapitulate, I would like to accentu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84651162791 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33947477846 2.71678728327 86% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576744186047 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2312585594 50.4703680194 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1538461538 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5384615385 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145659738983 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053988195321 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847549845936 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.085312468434 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.083111054562 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 12.6369458128 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 55.0591133005 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.