technological access to online music
The importance of technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. Which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain his argument but the most preponderant one stems the fact that it provides help to struggling singers and composers, so that they learn myriad thing from new technology. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that they also provide motivation to the upcoming singer. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that it reduce market value and popularity of a composed music. Besides, it decreases motivation of singer. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of technological access to online music and the like should be free are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | namdev190@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Alireza.r.m | 94 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Mahdi_Farhani | 85 | view |
- technological access to online music 77
- some people think the advertisement is bad 77
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 55
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answe 85
- information available online so library books 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ic and the like should be free or paid. Which was always debatable has now become mor...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23265306122 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81013812855 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587755102041 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6923076923 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6153846154 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178530907112 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692876902709 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15485258364 0.071462118173 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115696501986 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102978640708 0.0609392437508 169% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.