With technology speeding up, more and more young people begin to use mobile phones and the Internet, but old people have little chance to be exposed to them. What ways could mobile phone and the Internet be useful to old people? How can old people be encouraged to use this new technology?
Recently, old people's encouragement of using mobile phone and internet has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "how can old people be encouraged to use this new technology?". Whereas it is a widely held view that old people have little chance to use these new technology, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technology standpoint, modern equipment’s are bound up inextricably with internet, which indicates they lead to both science and entertainment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between smart phone and computer as well as an exponential increase in internet access. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of telecommunication is correlated positively with not only broadband connection but also E-mail.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, learning methods attribute to nursery homes, in that it would come down to old age individuals, pensioners, and others. A salient example of such attribution is digital gadget, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take health purpose for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint non-familiar problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to Television, mass media, and even family members. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of educational programs in community, nursing home, and mass media.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that applicable learning techniques must be taken to consideration to solve this problem. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the technology standpoint, modern e...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...adband connection but also E-mail. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity, nursing home, and mass media. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77516778523 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28670847387 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701342281879 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3053057519 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.384615385 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282951948511 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06971837522 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112571788319 0.071462118173 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149423894064 0.151781067708 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162385284745 0.0609392437508 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.