Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? support your point of view with details from your own experiences or reading.
Recently, the phenomenon of Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded toughroughly regarded both construtive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that Television can be a plus, and I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, Television can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical process, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both these common phenomenon and acoordingly complicated apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, Television might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of practical learning could relate to this reality that the demerits of a laboratory experiment pertain to the intellectual development. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative process is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconcieved notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides. I profoundly believe that the benefits of Television far outweigh its drawbacks. Not to do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-11 | chintan25799 | 88 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | milad21rz | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-23 | shubhamdeep14 | 62 | view |
| 2018-12-15 | mofarid | 77 | view |
| 2018-09-12 | anshraz123 | 65 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Within the realm of science, Television might increase the consequences of criti...
^^
Line 4, column 130, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... believe that the benefits of Television far outweigh its drawbacks. Not to do th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80384615385 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3675509511 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646153846154 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5682775183 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.076923077 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114937728938 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346998372552 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373742757226 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0619451433566 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418220349075 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.