Tobacco in general and Cigarettes in particular is one of the highly consumed drug in the World. It is estimated that more than a billion people of all age groups around the world smoke cigarettes daily and legally. The long term consequences of such infamous trend are high for an individual as well as for the society. It’s the high time that government and individuals work together to eradicate this evil from the planet.
To commence with, government as a legislator can improvise stringent laws to discourage the smoking practice. For example, heavy tax could be levied on the smokers which will aid in the revenue generation. In addition, kids below a certain age must be prohibited from buying tobacco products.
On the other hand, Individual willpower plays an important role in quitting smoking or even better not indulging in it at all. On a personal level, folks must consider the hazardous level of health damage caused by smoking such as lung cancer and respiratory problems which not only affect them but also their family members and friends.
To sum up, as the foregoing discussion propounds the view that individual effort along with government regulations can play a major role in curbing the smoking menace. I believe that with the increasing awareness level, mankind will certainly be able to control the smoking and other tobacco addictions in the coming years.
- •What roles should governments, companies & individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Tobacco, mainly in the form of cigarettes, is one of the most widely-used drugs in the sorld. Over a billion adults legally smoke tobacco every day. The long term health costs are high – for smokers themselves, and for the wider community in terms of he 77
- Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, as for, for example, in addition, in general, in particular, such as, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09565217391 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69608692146 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647826086957 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 363.6 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8709809279 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.25397266985 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182170584331 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669886641133 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601833337898 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0991225881653 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0673902589554 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.